So, what dyou think? Is is better for parents to be together unhappy to give their child a stable well financed life, or parents to be apart, and happier, better equipped to take care of them because they don't have to constantly sort things out with their spouse? I thought perhaps you could argue that if a couple stayed together until the child was an adult and left home, and then split it wouldnt be so bad, but then, wouldnt the child feel as though if they hadnt left home, their parents would still be togther, and the home that was meant to be stable was just gone. On the other hand you could say that if they split when the child was young, they'd feel it was their fault they split, that they weren't enough to keep them together, and then if they stayed together, it was their own fault their parents were unhappy O_O
I don't know what's right. I think my parent's might split up. They fight so often, sometimes so explosively.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Don't ask me about the whole divorce issue but I was told a long time ago that if couples didn't fight it was a bad sign and just because they're arguing doesn't mean they never want to see the other person again.
ReplyDeleteMy parents were never married, but they split when I was young, like when I was one or two.
ReplyDeleteI think if the parents want to split, they should split, cuz as long as they keep good communication up with their child, all will be fine, and let's face it, a parents divorce is a valuable learning experience for a developing child.